Pull up the Wikipedia web page for Mariya Takeuchi’s “Plastic Love,” the 1984 single referred to now for re-popularizing the style of Japanese “town pop.” Then click on the primary of its hyperlinks (now not related to the language of the article itself), which ends up in Takeuchi’s personal web page. If you happen to stay following that very same professionalcedure, you’ll continue directly to Town Pop, then Japanese Pop Song, then Popular Song. Stay drilling down, and also you’ll move the very concepts of track and sound, then input the nation-states of physics, the scientific approach, logical propositions, and the philosophy of language. That is one examinationple professionalvided through the video above from YouTuber Now not David, which investigates whether or not all roads on Wikipedia eventually result in philosophy.
There’s, in fact, a Wikipedia web page about this, referred to as “Getting to Philosophy.” “Following the primary hyperhyperlink in the principle textual content of an English Wikipedia article, after which repeating the method for subsequent articles, usually results in the Philosophy article,” it says. “In February 2016, this was once true for 97% of all articles on Wikipedia (including this one).” As for the remainder, they “result in an article without any outmoveing wikilinks, to pages that don’t exist, or get caught in loops.” That is actually the case with the trail get starteding from “Plastic Love,” after Philosophy of Language is going in circles round concepts, abstraction, and logic itself, never somewhat achieveing Philosophy proper.
Or no less than that’s what happened for me nowadays; it will move differently tomorrow, and even a couple of seconds from now. Ever since Wikipedia went are living in 2001, its major difference from other encyclopedias has been that it’s constantly changing, and the speed of that fluctuate has simplest greater over the years. The “philosophy recreation,” as Now not David calls it, is all the time subject to damageage, but additionally to un-breakage. At normal occasions, Orange Juice to Philosophy takes thiryoungster steps, Apple Juice to Philosophy takes fifyoungster steps; each the Calgary Flames and Edmonton Oilers lie sixyoungster steps from Philosophy. However issues move haycord if someone is going and, say, re-orders the hyperlinks at the Consciousness article so Psychology comes first.
These items happen: Wikipedia is, in any case, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. And as you’ll see (no less than as of this writing), Consciousness now hyperlinks first to Philosophy once more. Those adjustments play havoc with the efforts of anyone check outing to map out the connections between one a part of Wikipedia and another, as Now not David does on this video. However they don’t regulate the joysdamalestal principles of internetpaintings design, which his analysis illuminates. As with the corpus callosum, which connects the 2 hemispheres of the human mind, Philosophy is much less important for what directly connects to it than for its personal function as a connector. And certainly, haven’t philosophers all the time needed to understand how eachfactor suits together?
Related content:
An Interactive Visualization of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
A Knowledge Visualization of Modern Philosophy, 1950–2018
Listen to Wikipedia: A Internet Website That Turns Each and every Wikipedia Edit Into Ambient Song in Actual Time
Philographics Items a Visual Dictionary of Philosophy: 95 Philosophical Concepts as Graphic Designs
Introduction to Philosophy: A Unfastened Route
135 Unfastened Philosophy eBooks
Primarily based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and hugecasts on towns, language, and culture. His initiatives come with the Substack newsletter Books on Towns and the e-book The Statemuch less Town: a Stroll via Twenty first-Century Los Angeles. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facee-book.